A few theses about “identity politics” and its false oppositions

  I see a lot of critiques and defences of “identity politics”. No doubt we will be seeing even more as the US Democratic Primary winds up. It's the sort of debate which is all about definitions. If identity politics is understood as “politics concerned with the struggles of oppressed minorities”, then the debate is … Continue reading A few theses about “identity politics” and its false oppositions

The three organising myths of centrist establishment Democrats and what’s wrong with them

Centrist Democrats often claim not to be tied to any specific theory of how politics works. However three central ideas reoccur over and over again in the rhetoric of centrist democrats. The cumulative effect of these ideas is to marginalise, in theory and practice, the left flank of their own party. However these ideas are … Continue reading The three organising myths of centrist establishment Democrats and what’s wrong with them

A very brief note on “pragmatism” and establishment democrats

For the establishment democrats, pragmatism always mean going further right. That there might be a pragmatic case to use left-wing demands strategically- e.g. as an ambit claim, as a point of differentiation, or to rally a base, never seems to occur to them. The whole point of being pragmatic is situational flexibility, but what they … Continue reading A very brief note on “pragmatism” and establishment democrats