Posting on Facebook about politics is often considered a bit low rent, and the more respectable sorts post their political thoughts to Twitter or whatever. However, Facebook has an advantage over Twitter when it comes to spreading political messages- there will be people who read your post who respect you for reasons other than your political … Continue reading The how and why of writing a heartfelt pro-Corbyn or Bernie Facebook post
I want to live in a boring economy and I’m proud of it
I am tired of risk. I would prefer a job that I know will be there in 5 years to "an exciting opportunity for career progression". I would rather a genie grant me a 100% chance of not being impoverished than even a 50% chance of being a billionaire. I want a career that supports … Continue reading I want to live in a boring economy and I’m proud of it
Whenever I feel down about the fact that this blog only gets about 20 unique visitors a day, I reread this
"An average academic journal article is read in its entirety by about 10 people." https://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/prof-no-one-is-reading-you (I should add that I strongly disagree with the "solutions" proposed by the article in question, but the headline figure certainly puts things in perspective).
Why we can’t (usefully) dismiss concern about the income of others as envious
I. The Easterlin paradox is the observation that country level happiness does not seem to increase overtime with income- even though there are many reasons to think it should- for example, income gives us choices, security, additional consumption and so on. The paradox grows even weirder when we reflect that individual increases in income do … Continue reading Why we can’t (usefully) dismiss concern about the income of others as envious
[WIP] [Technical] Extending the veil of ignorance argument for utilitarianism into an argument for ‘egalitarian’ interpersonal utility comparison
I. Plausibly there are actually two problems of interpersonal utility comparison- the epistemic problem and the ontological problem. The epistemic problem is the problem of how we could know that a given comparison is correct. The ontological problem is the problem of why we should think such comparisons are meaningful- anymore than measuring temperature against … Continue reading [WIP] [Technical] Extending the veil of ignorance argument for utilitarianism into an argument for ‘egalitarian’ interpersonal utility comparison
The end of Neoliberalism and the beginning of the venal age? Comment on Crooked Timber
The following comment was made on Crooked Timber by a friend (Tim Scriven). After speaking about it with him I'm reprinting it here with slight modifications as requested: "I have a take on Neoliberalism- it’s pretty poorly informed, but then a lot of people have pretty poorly informed takes on this subject. There are actually … Continue reading The end of Neoliberalism and the beginning of the venal age? Comment on Crooked Timber
A dollar is a dollar? What economists don’t get about indirect programs
[EDIT. I am no longer satisfied with my treatment of Ng's argument. It is perhaps not wrong as such, but it is like taking a 2 dimensional slice of a three dimensional object. I have ignored much of what is subtle and interesting in his take. I will leave this essay up though for two … Continue reading A dollar is a dollar? What economists don’t get about indirect programs
Agnotphantasia
Many have been astonished to discover the existence of aphantasia. Per Wikipedia: Aphantasia is the suggested name for a condition where one does not possess a functioning mind's eye and cannot voluntarily visualize imagery. I believe I may have an even stranger condition, which I call Agnotphantasia. I am unsure of whether or not I … Continue reading Agnotphantasia
Against Kaldor-Hicks, or an ethical weight of zero on distributional concerns is still an ethical weight.
Definition of a Kaldor-Hicks improvement & efficiency The notion of a Kaldor-Hicks improvement is a way of evaluating policies. As we shall see, it is a very bad one. A change is a Kaldor-Hicks improvement if and only if: A) It is a Pareto improvement (at least one party wins and no parties lose) OR … Continue reading Against Kaldor-Hicks, or an ethical weight of zero on distributional concerns is still an ethical weight.
CEOs don’t work especially hard
Boonta Vista bought my attention to this article in the Wall Street Journal regarding the Executive Time Use Project. The headline figure is that the average CEO works 55 hours a week. Already this is less than the big numbers that often get waved around about this sort of thing- most of the folk wisdom … Continue reading CEOs don’t work especially hard